In the upcoming Annual Meeting of the ABA, the Commission of Ethics 20/20 will consider amending Model Rule 5.5, which addresses unauthorized practice of law issues. Of particular concern is the issue of whether the Rule needs to be amended to address whether the proliferation of lawyers' use of technology allows them to maintain a "virtual practice" in a jurisdiction in which they are otherwise not licensed to practice. The key issue centers around the question of how much "virtual practice" is sufficiently "systematic and continuous" to require an attorney to become licensed in a particular jurisdiction.
If you have seen the draft proposal to amend Model Rule 5.5, which was circulated in September 2011, but sent back to the drawing board because of feedback suggesting that it did more to cloud the issues than to clarify the issues, you probably felt the same way.
In my humble opinion, at least for the time being, it may be much ado about nothing. The rule as it stands appears to address most issues, and there probably needs to be considerably more in-depth analysis and study before any tweeking to the Rule occurs. We've all dealt with pro hac vice issue, serving as and locating "local" counsel when necessary, and electronic filing hasn't really changed the process of being admitted, even if just temporarily, to a particular jurisdiction. Nonetheless, we have all seen how the practice of law has changed over the past ten to fifteen years, particularly as our dependence on electronic communication has multiplied exponentially, and this opinion could change as that dependence grows more and more.