I’ve been tracking — and participating in — Supreme Court product liability preemption cases for more than twenty years.  They have involved all sorts of federally regulated products, ranging from drugs & medical devices to pesticides to seatbelts.  Despite an enormous amount of brain racking, I still can’t figure out how to reconcile the Court’s decisions in these cases, much less predict how the Court will rule in future product liability preemption appeals.

Some of the cases involve federal statutes that contain express preemption provisions, and others involve the doctrine of implied conflict preemption.  Over the years, the Court, often in split or fragmented opinions, has come down both ways on federal preemption of product liability claims.  Two opinions issued during the last week of February illustrate this unpredictability.  Readers of this blog might be interested in my short analyses of Bruesewitz v. Wyeth (vaccines) and Williamson v. Mazda (seatbelts).

Bookmark and Share

Categories: Product Liability | Supreme Court

Actions: E-mail | Comments


Submit Blog

If you wish to submit a blog posting for DRI Today, send an email to today@dri.org with "Blog Post" in the subject line. Please include article title and any tags you would like to use for the post.

Search Blog

Recent Posts




Staff Login