Find a Lawyer
Latest DRI Blog Post
The Court Reporter
 

DRI Featured Articles

View More Articles
Optimizing Trial Technology and Tools

Even the most experienced trial attorney can be intimidated by the use of technology at trial.  The litigation world has come a long way.  In less than 15 years, we have gone from distributing paper copies of exhibits to jurors—even in complex commercial trials—to having a variety of technological options available.  And not just for displaying exhibits, but for scientific demonstrations, opening/closing aids, and showing live testimony from remote locations.  To be competitive, trial lawyers need to know what the technological options are, how to use them, and how to do so effectively.

 view more
Respond with Caution! Responses to Discovery “Subject to the Stated Objections” May Waive Your Client’s Objections

A growing number of federal courts have confirmed that the once-common discovery practice of asserting an objection, followed by a bare “conditional” response, i.e., stating that “Without waiving the stated objections, defendant will produce non-privileged responsive documents,” is now considered improper and may result in an inadvertent waiver of the party’s stated objections.

It has become common practice among many litigators to respond to a discovery request by stating the party’s objection, followed by a conditional response.  For instance, practitioners routinely respond to a discovery request by stating, “Subject to and without waiving the stated objections, Defendant will produce non-privileged responsive documents.” Many federal district courts are concluding that such a conditional response, without specifying which part is objected to and which part is being responded to, is improper and, most significantly, that a party may waive its objections by responding conditionally.  Sprint Comm. Co., L.P. v. Comcast Cable Comm., LLC, No. 11-02684-JWL, 2014 WL -------, *4–8 (D. Kan. Feb. 11, 2014), available at https://ecf.ksd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2011cv2684-177.

 view more
Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants: The Original Coffee Product Liability Case

Back in 1994, Stella Liebeck v. McDonalds Restaurants became one of the most talked about lawsuits in American history. To this day, that New Mexico state court case is an essential component of any tort reform debate or discussion of litigation lore.  At that time, and to this day, the thought of a fast food drive-thru customer spilling coffee on herself in her vehicle and later recovering a punitive verdict of $2.7 million was simply too much for many members of the public. As we all know, the case became fodder for late night talk show hosts and later, Internet commentators, most of whom were relatively unfamiliar with the basic facts of the case. Over the years, the case has become part cautionary tale, part urban legend, and individuals seeking confirmation of even the most basic facts of the case have encountered great difficulty (in part because the case resulted in no formal appellate opinion setting forth its factual and procedural background).

 view more
View More Articles

 

DRI Defense Docket

Display Articles By Topic
General Mills Amends New Legal Policies  - New York Times 4/18/2014
TIG Insurance Sues NHL to Limit Its Defense in Players’ Concussion Lawsuits  - Insurance Journal 4/18/2014
Two justices say high court will likely rule on NSA programs  - Reuters 4/18/2014
Tech workers seek to use Steve Jobs evidence in upcoming trial on no-hire accords  - Yahoo!Finance 4/18/2014
S.F.'s plastic-bag ban clears last legal hurdle  - The San Francisco Chronicle 4/18/2014
Ohio case before U.S. Supreme Court could decide whether states can criminalize campaign lies  - The Cleveland Plain Dealer 4/18/2014
NHL Sees More Concussion Suits Filed by Former Players  - Claims Journal 4/18/2014
Capital One scores IP litigation victory over Intellectual Ventures  - Inside Counsel 4/18/2014
Va. Supreme Court backs ex-U.Va. climate researcher  - Richmond Times Dispatch 4/18/2014
4th Circuit throws open courtroom windows in ‘Company Doe’ ruling  - Reuters 4/18/2014
Courtroom struggles with connectivity issues as Apple-Samsung case is heard  - Inside Counsel 4/18/2014
Teva settles patent suit with Pfizer over Celebrex  - Yahoo!Finance 4/18/2014
Argentina's fight with bondholders reaches U.S. top court  - Reuters 4/18/2014
GlaxoSmithKline investigating bribery of foreign doctors  - Inside Counsel 4/18/2014
GM South Africa Apartheid Suit Allowed by U.S. Judge  - Bloomberg 4/18/2014
 

DRI Neutrals Database 

USLAW NETWORK’s Corporate Counsel Corner



DRI Resources